On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 08:32:29AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:39:04PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 11:24:57PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: > > > When I add a ToS field to that same rule, it appears that that rule is > > > not being processed; instead, it uses the default "pass all" rule and > > > queue. My first thought is that the ToS is wrong, but it's taken > > > right from Henning Brauer's altq/pf integration message, and I'm > > > assuming he's infallible. There's probably some subtlety that I'm > > > missing. > > yeah, the subtlety you're missing is that I'm not infallible ;-) > Well, *my* worldview has just taken a nasty shock. > > So, just to confirm: > > That syntax would be correct for a protocol that *did* set the ToS, i.e., > > pass out proto tcp from ($ExtIf) to any port $Port keep state tos 0x10 queue blah
yes, for a protocol that sets tos from the forst packet on, yes.
