Henning Brauer wrote:
* Federico Giannici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-08 20:32]:
I solved my case in a good way, but I'm currently not using states. I think that a general, intuitive and efficient solution could be useful.

The problem: queue assignment of "back" packets of TCP flows when "keep state" is used and queues are used in both directions. Currently the only solution seems to be to (almost) replicate the same rules for both interfaces ("in" and "out"). So the same rules are evaluated two time: more use of CPU and more rules to maintain.

this is untrue, you can just create queues with the same names on both interfaces. queue assignment does not have to happen on the interface where the queue lives.

That's really interesting.

And now the "on _interface_" parameter of the "queue" command start to make sense...


Bye.

--
___________________________________________________
    __
   |-                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   |ederico Giannici      http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________

Reply via email to