Henning Brauer wrote:
* Federico Giannici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-08 20:32]:
I solved my case in a good way, but I'm currently not using states. I
think that a general, intuitive and efficient solution could be useful.
The problem: queue assignment of "back" packets of TCP flows when "keep
state" is used and queues are used in both directions. Currently the
only solution seems to be to (almost) replicate the same rules for both
interfaces ("in" and "out"). So the same rules are evaluated two time:
more use of CPU and more rules to maintain.
this is untrue, you can just create queues with the same names on both
interfaces. queue assignment does not have to happen on the interface
where the queue lives.
That's really interesting.
And now the "on _interface_" parameter of the "queue" command start to
make sense...
Bye.
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________