On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:25, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and >> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you >> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on >> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash, >> please :P) into the main repository and push that. > > That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
That really depends on the workflow. It can be pretty darn efficient, particularly if you work with semi-working features. But it does take a different mindset - if you work on it with the traditional mindset, it's indeed a huge waste of time. >>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The >>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same >>> account or a different one. I actually don't care. >> >> Dave, any comment on that? > > The same account seems fine to me. Ok. I'll look into that then. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
