Le 18/08/2010 10:32, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:25, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and >>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you >>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on >>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash, >>> please :P) into the main repository and push that. >> >> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time. > > That really depends on the workflow. It can be pretty darn efficient, > particularly if you work with semi-working features. > > But it does take a different mindset - if you work on it with the > traditional mindset, it's indeed a huge waste of time. >
I'm not against having a new mindset, but that will take some time. I can probably try this with Luis. I have to talk with him about it. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
