Le 18/08/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and >> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you >> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on >> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash, >> please :P) into the main repository and push that. >
The "gleus branch", as you named it, should be a fork of "his branch", right? > That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time. > Yeah. I'm afraid all this will be a lot of work. Luis already worked with git, so he's at least a bit familiar with it. Adeel didn't AFAICT, so he'll need to learn all that. I also will need to learn a lot of it. >>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The >>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same >>> account or a different one. I actually don't care. >> >> Dave, any comment on that? > > The same account seems fine to me. > +1 -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
