Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess we should capture this error with a PG_TRY and silently abort instead.
> Just a NOTICE or INFO should be sufficient. Other errors should of course be
> rethrown.
This falls in the category of "destabilizing the code for purely
cosmetic reasons", and would be a foolish change to make at RC1 time.
We could change the text of the ERROR message reasonably easily,
but changing the basic transaction abort method is right out.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
