Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I was envisioning just using PostmasterRandom() (after initializing > the seed from time(NULL) as we do now). I don't think we need a > super-wide random number. Fine with me. Just that and CanAcceptConnections in the response? It seems like pg_ping (client utility and related postmaster support) should be a discrete patch. Improvements to pg_ctl and init scripts would come later, as separate patches? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
