Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alternatively, do the postmaster support and make the > presumably-minor pg_ctl mods to use it, and then a standalone > pg_ping utility could come later. I'm not sure how big the utility > would be, but surely bigger than the delta in pg_ctl. Bigger than the delta for *just this change* to pg_ctl. I was thinking of addressing all pg_ctl issues at once, but perhaps this one makes sense on its own. If so, your alternative does sound better. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
