On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Steve Wolfe wrote: > > 1) Using only ODBC drivers. I don't know how much of an impact a driver > can > > make but it would seem that using native drivers would shutdown one source > > of objections. > > Using ODBC is guaranteed to slow down the benchmark. I've seen native > database drivers beat ODBC by anywhere from a factor of two to an order of > magnitude. I haven't had a chance to take a look at the benchmarks yet, having just seen this, but *if* Great Bridge performed their benchmarks such that all the databases were access via ODBC, then they are using an 'apples-to-apples' approach, as each will have similar slowdowns as a result ...
- [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Bryan White
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark result... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark result... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark re... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark re... Chris Bitmead