"Ross J. Reedstrom" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: > > Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) > > > > But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we > > tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. > > > > And in reply to the MySQL version comment/question, Ned said: > "We only used the released versions of each database." > > I took that to mean they used the latest released version of each > database. One thing I couldn't deduce: which operating system where the > commercial RDBMs run on top of? NT for one of them, for sure, but the > other can probably run on either of the quoted OSs. If it was run on NT, > we might be seeing the linux vs. NT effect. One of them ran on NT, the other four ran on Red Hat Linux 6.1.
- [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Bryan White
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark result... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark result... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark re... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark re... Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Adam Ruth