Doh! Sorry, I didn't cc Richard Brosnahan after all. He's at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ned Lilly wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > i haven't played with interbase yet, but my understanding is they have > > two types of server -- the "classic" (process per connection?) and a > > "superserver" (multithreaded). i'm guessing the multithreaded is faster > > (why bother with the added complexity if it isn't?) so which version > > did you run this test against? > > Classic. Superserver didn't work with the ODBC driver. Richard Brosnahan, > the lead engineer on the project at Xperts, could connect, but could not > successfully build tables and load them due to SQL errors. Feel free to > contact him directly (he's cc'ed here).
- [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Bryan White
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Steve Wolfe
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark result... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results fo... Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark result... Ned Lilly
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark re... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark re... Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Po... Adam Ruth