Strange.
I did a test on Redhat Linux 7.0 with fsync() turned off and my
batchfile of inserts ran 10 times as fast. But that was on an slow PC
with a slow IDE harddrive.
What Linux distribution and kernel version are you running?
Poul L. Christiansen
"Gary Howland (During daytime)" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a quickie - I heard that linux does not have a working fsync() call
> (it has no concept of raw devices). In other words, fsync cannot be used
> to ensure that data is on disk (try it with a floppy - it returns IMMEDIATELY!!! -
>long before the write finishes)
>
> This is for ALL linuxes.
>
> Does this mean that postgres is unrealiable (or non ACID-conforming) under linux?
>
> Gary
>
> --
> Friends help you move.
> Real friends help you move bodies.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Free Unlimited Internet Access! Try it now!
> http://www.zdnet.com/downloads/altavista/index.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
