On 21/11/2010, at 2:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance <elliotcha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> for...@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email >>>>> disappears but the mailing list gets another copy. When the mailing list >>>>> gets its copy it sends a copy to the forum (because the forum is just >>>>> like a subscribed user), the parser then dissects the headers to find out >>>>> where the post belongs. We already know this part works. >>>> >>>> So how does one respond to the user? >>> >>> I can't explain it any clearer, your email response goes to the mailing >>> list and that mailing list sends a copy to the original person thats how a >>> mailing list works. It also sends a copy to the forum which is parses you >>> and that person and anyone else can see the reply on the forum. >> >> Clearly you're not understanding my point. I don't *want* it to go to >> the list. I want to write a private email to the user who made a post >> from the forum, without having to set up and use a forum account. Just >> a simple response, just the way I can do now. >> >> But I'll leave it to somebody else to attempt to explain that, since I >> clearly am unable to get it across. > > I would argue that if the person wants to use a forum, aren't they > saying they don't want to be contacted via email. I think we just throw > it only to the forum (that is the user) and leave it that. Forum users > don't get the _rich_ email experience. ;-)
It does surprise me a bit that when I (or someone else) signs up to a mailing list (not postgres specifically) that there is no fine print or agreement that says something along the lines of "Your email address will be plastered all over the internet, guaranteed to be picked up by spiders, make sure you have a good anti-spam." This doesn't so much bother me because the address I use on the mailing list is public and already on googles index but I bet some people don't like it, and once they realise its too late you can't remove emails from a mailing list. Forums are designed to act as the barrier that stops anyone from getting your address if you so choose. ----- Now to elaborate on private messages. 1. I'm not going to use the persons real email without their permission regardless of if the safe-guards of a mailing list can be subverted. 2. It's no problem to put a line at the top of the email saying something like (I understand what you mean now Tom): "Replying to this email will be PUBLIC. If you would like to send a private response to "chancey" send your response to df62a...@postgresql.com.au." The "df62a...@postgresql.com.au" is a cached salted hash that stops anyone from guessing everyones username, and perhaps expires after 30 days or something. After which they can goto the persons profile page and send the message from their if they are desperate for a private reply. 3. That private message line will be stripped out before replies are shown on the forum since its not relevant information to the forum. 4. The "df62a...@postgresql.com.au" also does not go directly to the person but passes the message through the private message system in the forum (which of course still notifies them.) This is what forum users would expect. In particular but in my time as a developer one thing i've learnt is you not only have to make systems ultra idiot proof but also move all the important bits our of reach of that user. If we incorporated mailing list subscriptions with posting it will absolutely cause more problems that the benefits it brings, even if it sounds fine in *theory*. > > -- > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
