On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:04, Alban Hertroys <dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> wrote: > On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> Elliot, Magnus wants forum->list email to come from a per-user address >> so that when he replies directly to that address (without sending it >> to the list), the response is mapped to a PM. > Actually, I think that's only your approach to a possible solution to achieve > what he wants? I was simply trying to "translate" the issues between the two environments, as it were. A per-user email address is what Magnus requested: >>> Based on that, I'm back to saying that the email has to be generated >>> from a valid email address, that can be used for return traffic. >>> Whether it's the users original address or a forum-specific one is a >>> different question, but a blackhole catch-all one just won't do. > I do see a difficulty here; if the forum software is only subscribed with one > e-mail address, how is it going to distinguish between a reply-all and a > private reply? > Maybe it would help to subscribe it using two or three addresses, so that you > can see if both (or at least two out of three) addresses got the reply, or > only one? Once the forum software determines an incoming email is meant to be a private message, how would it determine which user it is meant for? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
