Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > have you tried adding a volatile keyword to the
> > int volatile errno1_set = 0;
> > int volatile errno2_set = 0;
> >
> > I have applied the following patch to CVS head which does a getpid() in
> > the loop, rather than nothing.
>
> That does not cure the bug identified by wespvp. It may make it a
> little less likely that the compiler will choose to optimize out the
> loop test, but only adding "volatile" really fixes the problem in
> a language-standard-compliant way.
Thanks, 'volatile' added to the thread-specific errno variables:
volatile int errno1_set = 0;
volatile int errno2_set = 0;
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
