> On 29 Nov 2021, at 22:47, Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: > > On 11/29/21, 1:38 PM, "Chapman Flack" <c...@anastigmatix.net> wrote: >> On 11/29/21 16:31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> That's a good point, the hint is targeting users who might not even know >>> that >>> an extension needs to be physically and separately installed on the machine >>> before it can be installed in their database; so maybe using "installed" >>> here >>> isn't entirely helpful at all. That being said I'm at a loss for a more >>> suitable word, "available" perhaps? >> >> Maybe a larger break with the "This means the extension something something" >> formulation, and more on the lines of >> >> HINT: an extension must first be present (for example, installed with a >> package manager) on the system where PostgreSQL is running. > > I like this idea. I can do it this way in the next revision if others > agree.
I think taking it in this direction has merits. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
