On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 04:19:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:21 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Agreed. > >> > > > > +1. How about attached? > > That's the same thing as what I sent upthread, so that's correct to > me, except that I have fixed both functions :) >
Sorry, I hadn't looked at your patch. > You are not touching pg_stat_get_subscription_worker() because the > plan is to revert it from HEAD? I have not followed the other > discussion closely. > It is still under discussion. I'll take the necessary action along with other things related to that view based on the conclusion on that thread. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
