On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:00:43PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> That's the same thing as what I sent upthread, so that's correct to >> me, except that I have fixed both functions :) > > Sorry, I hadn't looked at your patch.
That's fine. This is something you have committed, after all. >> You are not touching pg_stat_get_subscription_worker() because the >> plan is to revert it from HEAD? I have not followed the other >> discussion closely. >> > > It is still under discussion. I'll take the necessary action along > with other things related to that view based on the conclusion on that > thread. Sounds good to me. The patch you are proposing upthread is OK for me. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
