John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 1:11 AM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_IN_USE),
> - errmsg("could not drop replication origin with OID %d, in use by PID %d",
> + errmsg("could not drop replication origin with OID %u, in use by PID %d",
> RepOriginId is a typedef for uint16, so this can't print the wrong answer,
> but it is inconsistent with other uses. So it seems we don't need to
> backpatch this one?
Um ... if it's int16, then it can't be an OID, so I'd say this message has
far worse problems than %d vs %u. It should not use that terminology.
regards, tom lane
