On Fri, Aug 12, 2022, at 3:59 AM, John Naylor wrote: > This is really a straw-man proposal, since I'm not volunteering to do > the work, or suggest anybody else should do the same. That being the > case, it seems we should just go ahead with Justin's patch for > consistency. Possibly we could also change the messages to say "ID"? ... or say
could not drop replication origin %u, in use by PID %d AFAICS there is no "with ID" but there is "with identifier". I personally prefer to omit these additional words; it seems clear without them. -- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/