On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 4:40 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for addressing my previous comments. Patch v14-0001 looks good
> to me, except I have one question:
>
> The patch uses errmsg_internal() for the logging, but I noticed the
> only other code using GUC 'log_replication_commands' has errmsg()
> instead of errmsg_internal(). Isn't it better to be consistent with
> the existing code?
>

I agree that we should errmsg here. If we read the description of
errmsg_internal() [1], it is recommended to be used for "cannot
happen" cases where we don't want to spend translation effort which is
not the case here. Also, similar to the below message, we should add a
comment for a translator.

ereport(LOG,
/* translator: %s is SIGKILL or SIGABRT */
(errmsg("issuing %s to recalcitrant children",
send_abort_for_kill ? "SIGABRT" : "SIGKILL")));

Another minor comment:
+        Causes each replication command and <literal>walsender</literal>
+        process replication slot acquisition/release to be logged in the server
+        log.

Isn't it better to use process's instead of process in the above sentence?

[1] -https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/error-message-reporting.html

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


Reply via email to