Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > . o O ( int64_t, PRIdi64, etc were standardised a quarter of a century ago )
Yeah. Now that we require C99 it's probably reasonable to assume
that those things exist. I wouldn't be in favor of ripping out our
existing notations like UINT64CONST, because the code churn would be
substantial and the gain minimal. But we could imagine reimplementing
that stuff atop <stdint.h> and then getting rid of the configure-time
probes.
regards, tom lane
