>-----Original Message----- >From: Yotsunaga, Naoki [mailto:yotsunaga.na...@jp.fujitsu.com] >Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 5:05 PM
>Does that mean that the application (user) is interested in which table? >For example, there are two tables A. It is ok even if one table disappears, >but it is troubled if another table B disappears. So, when the table B is >dropped, automatic restore point works. In the table A, automatic restore >point does not work. >So, it is difficult to implement that automatic restore point in postgresql by >default. >Is my interpretation right? I want to hear about the following in addition to the previous comment. What would you do if your customer dropped the table and asked you to restore it? Everyone is thinking what to do to avoid operation failure, but I’m thinking about after the user’s failure. What I mean is that not all users will set up in advance. For example, if you make the settings described in the manual, you will not drop the table by operation failure. However, not all users do that setting. For such users, I think that it is necessary to have a function to easily restore data after failing operation without setting anything in advance. So I proposed this function. --- Naoki Yotsunaga
