To: Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>, [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition In-Reply-To: <CAAAe_zCd+gzpYSsC04NsKyCJeneChVZCaBP540d0p2= [email protected]>
Hi Tatsuo, > v50-0021-adjust-rpr_base-expected-output.patch > revert-0001-remove-incidental-changes.patch > revert-0002-revert-mark-position-elog.patch > revert-0003-restore-funcname-guard.patch > revert-0004-restore-doc-line-wrapping.patch > revert-0005-remove-exclude-ties-tests.patch > optional-0001-include-row-positions-in-mark-position-error.patch > optional-0002-remove-unreachable-funcname-guard.patch > optional-0003-add-exclude-ties-test-coverage.patch Apologies for the noise -- the nine attachments above are not a new full patch series. They are the small auxiliary patches described in that mail (the v50-0021 build fix plus the revert-*/optional-* hunks), meant to be applied selectively on top of the current v50 series, not to replace it. Because I attached them as .patch files, cfbot will treat them as the latest patch set and try to apply them to master. They are not the series and will fail there, so the CF entry will go red through no fault of the actual patch -- please disregard that run. Re-posting the full series is what restores cfbot, but a plain re-post of v49 stays red on its own: it needs v50-0021 (the rpr_base expected-output fix) folded in to build green. Could you re-post the series with v50-0021 applied, so cfbot tracks the right patch set and goes green again? Sorry again for the confusion. Best, Henson
