On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 3:07 AM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > I originally opted against displaying the mapped name to keep > pg_control_checkpoint a way to extract the raw data, but thinking about it > might be more useful to show the mapped value since the mapping is private.
I suggested making pg_controldata report the latest checkpoint's checksum state as text rather than as a version. But, I found that pg_controldata reports similar information "Data page checksum version", and pg_control_init() exposes data_page_checksum_version as an integer version. This makes me wonder whether we should drop my suggestion and keep the latest checkpoint's checksum field as a version as well, or instead move toward reporting textual checksum states consistently in all these places. Or is there another approach that would make more sense? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
