On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 11:56 PM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm leaning towards using an integer representation in v19, which is the safe > option, and rethink it for v20 when we can consider it without any rush. A > compromise could be do document the integer <=> state name mapping in the > checksums section in the docs.
+1 to keep using "version" for now and clarify the mapping in the docs. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
