On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 5:16 AM Zhijie Hou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, but keeping RI FULL also doesn't harm; rather it tests something
> > extra which is that it can extract required values from the full
> > tuple. So, I am okay either way. I have modified the comments at
> > multiple places in the patch as I find there is a lot of redundancy in
> > the comments. See attached top-up patch. BTW, we need a separate patch
> > for v18 as well.
>
> Thanks for the diff. I have merged and prepared the patches for
> back branches as well.
Thanks! These all apply and look good to me. I'll mark the CF entry as
Ready for Committer.
Yours,
--
Paul ~{:-)
[email protected]
