On 2019-Jul-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > (There is also precedent for redirecting the extension function to the > internal one by changing the SQL-level function definition using CREATE > OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... LANGUAGE INTERNAL. But that seems more > complicated and would require a new extension version.
One issue with this approach is that it forces the internal function to remain unchanged forever. That seems OK in this particular case. > It could maybe be included if the extension version is changed for > other reasons.) Maybe add a comment in the control file (?) so that we remember to do it then. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
