On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:31, Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:04 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > While I'm quite on board with providing useful error cursors,
> > the example cases in this patch don't seem all that useful:
> >
> >  -- trying to create range partition with empty range
> >  CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF range_parted2 FOR VALUES FROM (1)
> TO (0);
> >  ERROR:  empty range bound specified for partition "fail_part"
> > +LINE 1: ...E fail_part PARTITION OF range_parted2 FOR VALUES FROM (1)
> T...
> > +                                                             ^
> >  DETAIL:  Specified lower bound (1) is greater than or equal to upper
> bound (0).
> >
> > As best I can tell from these examples, the cursor will always
> > point at the FROM keyword, making it pretty unhelpful.  It seems
> > like in addition to getting the query string passed down, you
> > need to do some work on the code that's actually reporting the
> > error position.  I'd expect at a minimum that the pointer allows
> > identifying which column of a multi-column partition key is
> > giving trouble.  The phrasing of this particular message, for
> > example, suggests that it ought to point at the "1" expression.
>
> I agree with that.  Tried that in the attached 0002, although trying
> to get the cursor to point to exactly the offending column seems a bit
> tough for partition overlap errors.  The patch does allow to single
> out which one of the lower and upper bounds is causing the overlap
> with an existing partition, which is better than now and seems helpful
> enough.
>
> Also, updated Alexandra's patch to incorporate Ashutosh's comment such
> that we get the same output with ATTACH PARTITION commands too.
>

I looked at this briefly. It looks good, but I will review more in the next
CF. Do we have entry there yet? To nit-pick: for a multi-key value the ^
points to the first column and the reader may think that that's the
problematci column. Should it instead point to ( ?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh

Reply via email to