On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 05:27:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > By the way-- What did you think of the idea of explictly marking the > types used for bitmasks using types bits32 and friends, instead of plain > int, which is harder to spot?
Right, we could just do that while the area is changed. It is worth noting that all the REINDEX_REL_* handling could be brushed. Another point that has been raised on a recent thread by Peter was that people preferred an hex style for the declarations rather than bit shifts. What do you think? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
