On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com > > > > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the comment. > > > Attach new version patches which clean the table at the end. > > > > > > > + * For partitioned table contained in the publication, we must > > + * invalidate all partitions contained in the respective partition > > + * trees, not just the one explicitly mentioned in the publication. > > > > Can we slightly change the above comment as: "For the partitioned tables, we > > must invalidate all partitions contained in the respective partition > > hierarchies, > > not just the one explicitly mentioned in the publication. This is required > > because we implicitly publish the child tables when the parent table is > > published." > > > > Apart from this, the patch looks good to me. > > > > I think we need to back-patch this till v13. What do you think? > > I agreed. > > Attach patches for back-branch, each has passed regression tests and pgindent. >
Thanks, your patches look good to me. I'll push them sometime next week after Tuesday unless there are any comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.