> > erk, can we get this somehow done in such a way that its part of the > > *standard* regression tests? so when ppl do 'make test', > > the GiST stuff is checked also? My worry, as with others, isn't that > > GiST itself is broken by the changes, its that *somehow* there is an > > interaction that is with the rest of the system that isn't being tested ... > > No way, we need to load functions. there are several contributions > which depends on loaded functions. If you suggest how to do this > in general way, it would fine. To test GiST you need to define some > data structure ( in our case - RD-tree) and functions to access it Look at regress/input/create_function_1.source for hints from SPI tests... Vadim
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane