Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about adding an optional test a la "bigtest" for GiST for this > release? We could do that, but it seems like rather pointless effort, compared to just telling people "go run the tests in these contrib modules if you want to test GIST". I have no objection to fully integrating some GIST test(s) for 7.2. I just don't want to deal with it at this late stage of the 7.1 cycle. We have a long list of considerably more mainstream to-do items yet to deal with ... regards, tom lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] Getting configure to... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Getting configur... Peter Eisentraut