On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > How about adding an optional test a la "bigtest" for GiST for this > release? It could go mainstream for 7.1.x or for 7.2 as we get more > experience with it. This is just a suggestion and I'm sure there are > other possibilities. I'm pretty sure we agree on most of points 1-8, and > that 1-3 are resolved. Comments? make GIST_TEST=yes to include GiST testing would be cool, if it can be done ... this way Tom's worry about non-GiST users having bad regress tests is appeased ... but I do agree with Tom that mainstreaming the GiST testing would be a bad idea ... if we could somehow include it as an optional test (as you say, ala bigtest), then, if nothing else, it saves having to cd to the contrib directory and run it there ... ala one stop shopping ... *But*, for the 3 ppl we've pointed out as users of GiST, this is definitely not a priority issue ... if we can do it, great, if not, no sweat either ...
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] Getting configure to... Tom Lane