RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes

[Hiroshi Inoue]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane > > I have just sent to the pgsql-patches list a rather large set of > proposed diffs for the WAL code. These changes: > > * Store two past checkpoint locations, not just one, in pg_control. > On startup, we fall back to the older checkpoint if the newer one > is unreadable. Also, a physical copy of the newest checkpoint record > is kept in pg_control for possible use in disaster recovery (ie, > complete loss of pg_xlog). Also add a version number for pg_control > itself. Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC > parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented yet anyway). > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ? Regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])