Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes

[Ian Lance Taylor]

"Vadim Mikheev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I feel that the fact that
> 
> WAL can't help in the event of disk errors
> 
> is often overlooked.

This is true in general.  But, nevertheless, WAL can be written to
protect against predictable disk errors, when possible.  Failing to
write a couple of disk blocks when the system crashes is a reasonably
predictable disk error.  WAL should ideally be written to work
correctly in that situation.

Ian

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 102: An atom-blaster is a good weapon, but it can point both ways.
                -- Isaac Asimov

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]