"Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented yet anyway). > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ? Why shouldn't it be? I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Ian Lance Taylor