[ redirecting thread to -hackers ]
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.
> I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> "synchronized_seqscans"?
We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
