On Jan 27, 2008, at 21:04 , Tom Lane wrote:
[ redirecting thread to -hackers ]
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.
I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
"synchronized_seqscans"?
We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
Would it make sense to match the plural as well?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
