> >> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself. > > > I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or > > "synchronized_seqscans"? > > We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.
Yes looks good, how about synchronized_seqscan without plural ?
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
