On Feb 5, 2008 3:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read > > > the message. My complaint is really directed at certain admin packages > > > (and they know who they are) that invoke pg_dump *by default*, behind > > > the user's back, with -i. > > > > Oh? That isn't good. > > Right. Dave - why do we do that? ;-)
I didn't realise we did until Tom mentioned it - I didn't write that code. Please go ahead and remove the -i - it's not like users cannot cannot specify which set of pg utilities to use if they need a specific version. /D ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
