Dave Page wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read
the message. My complaint is really directed at certain admin packages
(and they know who they are) that invoke pg_dump *by default*, behind
the user's back, with -i.
Oh? That isn't good.
Right. Dave - why do we do that? ;-)
I didn't realise we did until Tom mentioned it - I didn't write that code.
Please go ahead and remove the -i - it's not like users cannot cannot
specify which set of pg utilities to use if they need a specific
version.
Ok, done!
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
