Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I was thinking of writing something that scraped the archives building a > > lookup table out of this information. What would be nice is if the > > X-Message-Id and X-Reference were both put into the regular HTML for > > future archived messages so that it's more likely tools like Google > > could search based on them. A brief glance at the MHonArc documentation > > suggests that could be run to re-covert any existing messages that are > > still available in order to add to those even. > > We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on > search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there > perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If > that's all we need, we could easily have an url like > http://search.postgresql.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] redirect > to the proper page on archives?
Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link to that easily. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
