Magnus Hagander wrote: > Gregory Stark wrote: > > "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>> We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on > >>> search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there > >>> perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If > >>> that's all we need, we could easily have an url like > >>> http://search.postgresql.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] redirect > >>> to the proper page on archives? > >> Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link > >> to that easily. > > > > I would very much like such a URL as well. At a guess it would require > > hacking > > the tsearch parser we use for the search engine on the web site? > > No, it requires hacking the indexing script, and we'll store the > messageid in it's own column in the table.
Yea, it would be nice if we could do it. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
