Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> From the "idle thoughts in the middle of the night" department:
>
> I don't know if this has come up before exactly, but is it possible that
> we could get a performance gain from building multiple indexes from a
> single sequential pass over the base table? If so, that would probably
> give us a potential performance improvement in pg_restore quite apart
> from the projected improvement to be got from running several steps in
> parallel processes. The grammar might look a bit ugly, but I'm sure we
> could finesse that.
TODO already has:
* Allow multiple indexes to be created concurrently, ideally via a
single heap scan, and have pg_restore use it
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
