"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The example I have in mind is Perl, as I have referred to before. It comes > with > a number of useful modules (e.g. File::Find, and CGI) that don't have to be in > the perl core distribution but are very widely used and so having them there > makes some sense.
What's different about those is that they are developed primarily as CPAN modules. The ones in the perl source are just copies of the CPAN module installed by default. Would that help earn respect for pgfoundry? Modules there would have something to aspire to if they grew to be considered indispensable rather than just be doomed to being forgotten and ignored. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
