Joshua D. Drake escribió: > On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:01:30 -0300 > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I could see it with older submitters, who are used to just sending an > > email, but the new guys will go with whatever procedure is laid out > > for them *as long as* it is enforced ... > > Just as a note... email can be used as a submission procedure to a > patch tracker.
Yes, but it sucks, because either you create one for every email, or you have to give an explicit command to be captured by the system. I think the "workflow" over email is unstructured enough that there always needs to be a human to do some selective capturing of information. As soon as you get into things like creating templates which patch submitters are supposed to use, it's the about the same as having to go to the web interface to enter the patch. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
