Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we're going to go down this path, why would we not put the
>> "reference" typedef list into CVS?
> Uh, I assume we don't want an automated system updating the file in CVS.
Nowhere did I suggest that. What I suggested is that the "considered
good" reference list should be in CVS, not on some random wiki page.
In particular there's something pretty broken about the idea of a file
in CVS telling people to go to a wiki page for important data.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
