I will try to look at it again in a few days.
cheers
andrew
Bruce Momjian wrote:
What is our plan for pgindent for 8.4? I would rather not have to bug
someone to create a list of symbols manually. I would like it to be
built on a regular basis and I can pull it from there and add it to CVS
when I run pgindent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Gregory Stark wrote:
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
doxygen's 200-some is clearly an order of magnitude too low, but I
wonder whether Bruce's list hasn't got some false hits ...
Skimming the output it does have things like "int" and "float" but presumably
we would know if that caused any problem, they wouldn't inflate the numbers
much.
2800 does seem a bit high. My buildfarm member dungbeetle just found 2482 on a
build that is only missing the optional pam, bonjour and gssapi config options.
The numbers going to vary heavily from OS to OS so it seems to me that these
are a basically the same order of magnitude.
It looks like Windows will blow all our existing numbers out of the
water. Here's a list generated from Cygwin with 6088 symbols. I'm
working on getting a similar list from MinGW.
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=brown_bat&dt=2008-04-18%20230054&stg=typedefs
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
