Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> If we're going to go down this path, why would we not put the > >> "reference" typedef list into CVS? > > > Uh, I assume we don't want an automated system updating the file in CVS. > > Nowhere did I suggest that. What I suggested is that the "considered > good" reference list should be in CVS, not on some random wiki page. > In particular there's something pretty broken about the idea of a file > in CVS telling people to go to a wiki page for important data.
I have no problem using a URL to pull down the typedef list via wget. How is that CVS file going to be updated? Is someone manually going to update it in CVS, and how often? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
